remove newline from logging statements. (#5022)
remove newline from logging statements in code. The LOG_* functions will now magically add it at the end. --------- Co-authored-by: Ben Meadors <benmmeadors@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ meshtastic_MeshPacket *MeshModule::allocAckNak(meshtastic_Routing_Error err, Nod
|
||||
p->decoded.request_id = idFrom;
|
||||
p->channel = chIndex;
|
||||
if (err != meshtastic_Routing_Error_NONE)
|
||||
LOG_WARN("Alloc an err=%d,to=0x%x,idFrom=0x%x,id=0x%x\n", err, to, idFrom, p->id);
|
||||
LOG_WARN("Alloc an err=%d,to=0x%x,idFrom=0x%x,id=0x%x", err, to, idFrom, p->id);
|
||||
|
||||
return p;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ meshtastic_MeshPacket *MeshModule::allocErrorResponse(meshtastic_Routing_Error e
|
||||
|
||||
void MeshModule::callModules(meshtastic_MeshPacket &mp, RxSource src)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// LOG_DEBUG("In call modules\n");
|
||||
// LOG_DEBUG("In call modules");
|
||||
bool moduleFound = false;
|
||||
|
||||
// We now allow **encrypted** packets to pass through the modules
|
||||
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void MeshModule::callModules(meshtastic_MeshPacket &mp, RxSource src)
|
||||
assert(!pi.myReply); // If it is !null it means we have a bug, because it should have been sent the previous time
|
||||
|
||||
if (wantsPacket) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Module '%s' wantsPacket=%d\n", pi.name, wantsPacket);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Module '%s' wantsPacket=%d", pi.name, wantsPacket);
|
||||
|
||||
moduleFound = true;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -144,20 +144,20 @@ void MeshModule::callModules(meshtastic_MeshPacket &mp, RxSource src)
|
||||
if (isDecoded && mp.decoded.want_response && toUs && (!isFromUs(&mp) || isToUs(&mp)) && !currentReply) {
|
||||
pi.sendResponse(mp);
|
||||
ignoreRequest = ignoreRequest || pi.ignoreRequest; // If at least one module asks it, we may ignore a request
|
||||
LOG_INFO("Asked module '%s' to send a response\n", pi.name);
|
||||
LOG_INFO("Asked module '%s' to send a response", pi.name);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Module '%s' considered\n", pi.name);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Module '%s' considered", pi.name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the requester didn't ask for a response we might need to discard unused replies to prevent memory leaks
|
||||
if (pi.myReply) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Discarding an unneeded response\n");
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Discarding an unneeded response");
|
||||
packetPool.release(pi.myReply);
|
||||
pi.myReply = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (handled == ProcessMessage::STOP) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Module '%s' handled and skipped other processing\n", pi.name);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Module '%s' handled and skipped other processing", pi.name);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ void MeshModule::callModules(meshtastic_MeshPacket &mp, RxSource src)
|
||||
// no response reply
|
||||
|
||||
// No one wanted to reply to this request, tell the requster that happened
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("No one responded, send a nak\n");
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("No one responded, send a nak");
|
||||
|
||||
// SECURITY NOTE! I considered sending back a different error code if we didn't find the psk (i.e. !isDecoded)
|
||||
// but opted NOT TO. Because it is not a good idea to let remote nodes 'probe' to find out which PSKs were "good" vs
|
||||
@@ -187,8 +187,7 @@ void MeshModule::callModules(meshtastic_MeshPacket &mp, RxSource src)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!moduleFound && isDecoded) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("No modules interested in portnum=%d, src=%s\n", mp.decoded.portnum,
|
||||
(src == RX_SRC_LOCAL) ? "LOCAL" : "REMOTE");
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("No modules interested in portnum=%d, src=%s", mp.decoded.portnum, (src == RX_SRC_LOCAL) ? "LOCAL" : "REMOTE");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -211,7 +210,7 @@ void MeshModule::sendResponse(const meshtastic_MeshPacket &req)
|
||||
currentReply = r;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Ignore - this is now expected behavior for routing module (because it ignores some replies)
|
||||
// LOG_WARN("Client requested response but this module did not provide\n");
|
||||
// LOG_WARN("Client requested response but this module did not provide");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -240,7 +239,7 @@ std::vector<MeshModule *> MeshModule::GetMeshModulesWithUIFrames()
|
||||
for (auto i = modules->begin(); i != modules->end(); ++i) {
|
||||
auto &pi = **i;
|
||||
if (pi.wantUIFrame()) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("%s wants a UI Frame\n", pi.name);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("%s wants a UI Frame", pi.name);
|
||||
modulesWithUIFrames.push_back(&pi);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -255,7 +254,7 @@ void MeshModule::observeUIEvents(Observer<const UIFrameEvent *> *observer)
|
||||
auto &pi = **i;
|
||||
Observable<const UIFrameEvent *> *observable = pi.getUIFrameObservable();
|
||||
if (observable != NULL) {
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("%s wants a UI Frame\n", pi.name);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("%s wants a UI Frame", pi.name);
|
||||
observer->observe(observable);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -273,7 +272,7 @@ AdminMessageHandleResult MeshModule::handleAdminMessageForAllModules(const mesht
|
||||
AdminMessageHandleResult h = pi.handleAdminMessageForModule(mp, request, response);
|
||||
if (h == AdminMessageHandleResult::HANDLED_WITH_RESPONSE) {
|
||||
// In case we have a response it always has priority.
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Reply prepared by module '%s' of variant: %d\n", pi.name, response->which_payload_variant);
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Reply prepared by module '%s' of variant: %d", pi.name, response->which_payload_variant);
|
||||
handled = h;
|
||||
} else if ((handled != AdminMessageHandleResult::HANDLED_WITH_RESPONSE) && (h == AdminMessageHandleResult::HANDLED)) {
|
||||
// In case the message is handled it should be populated, but will not overwrite
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user